South Australian man jailed for importing childlike doll and possessing abusive images

[ad_1] rc9PlBJu48OEJpQVRC dr2CErN3UhCU3JTxZgD8 RR8

South Australian man jailed for importing childlike doll and possessing abusive images

13 thoughts on “South Australian man jailed for importing childlike doll and possessing abusive images

  1. RichardOfFalador says:

    Ummmhe was jailed for possession of thousands of images and 100+ videos of children under 10 being abused…

    Why does the article lead with the sex doll thing when the sentence was based on the abuse material?

  2. SaltpeterSal says:

    Article: The man possessed several images of sex crime scenes, which are shared among abusers as trophies.

    These comments: Wow gee next we’ll be prosecuting people for not getting consent from sex toys, I mean it’s not like reproducing and sharing pictures of children’s abuse is making them more of [Pedo fart noises.]

    These articles really bring them out.

  3. EASY_EEVEE says:

    i can’t believe i have to ask this, but was it hentai images or real images?

    As for the doll? i don’t see a problem with it either, it’s fake, not real. So did they come after him over the doll, i’m genuinely confused there?

    Finally is the big one. “He said Sharp’s interest in children was evident as he had taken pictures of children in his local neighbourhood.” that too me is inexcusable. If that’s real, that’s wrong.

    See too me, if it’s not real. If it’s a drawing, a doll. Not a ***real*** victim, meh, now if it is ***real***, if there is indeed a ***real*** human being, made of flesh and blood, human with emotions and isn’t made of rubber or pixals, than yeah, he should be thrown in jail.

  4. SokalDidNothingWrong says:

    It’s the PC thing to say that sexual proclivities are entirely the result of nature. For example, gay porn won’t make more men gay. Gay nightclubs won’t make more men gay.

    We want gay people to live normal lives, so we lie and say “it’s 100% not a choice, it’s just the way they are”.

    I’d say this is wrong on two counts. First, sexuality is partly the result of environment. Second, it’s not a problem if a few men decide they just want to date men and a few women decide they just want to date women; what the hell is wrong with that? Not everyone is flexible but a lot of people are, and there’s nothing wrong with that as long as it’s all consenting adults doing safe things.

    OTOH and I suspect many pedos have a bit of choice, and making this kind of thing available to them makes them more of a risk to society.

Leave a Reply

This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By browsing this website, you agree to our use of cookies.